Participation and Motivation in Activities Relevant to Social Entrepreneurship among Secondary School Students in Kerala

Authors

  • Dr. Bindu T.V. Assistant Professor, Department of Education(ITEP), Central University of Kerala Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31305/ijmds.v15n09.007

Keywords:

social entrepreneurship education, secondary school students, student activities, entrepreneurial motivation, Kerala

Abstract

This study describes secondary school students’ participation in activities relevant to entrepreneurship and their reported motivations, with particular attention to the implications for social entrepreneurship education. A descriptive survey involved 265 students in Standards VIII and IX from 12 secondary schools in Kerala. The source report states that random sampling was used. Frequencies were retained from the supplied tables, and percentages were recalculated using the stated sample size. Pet care was the most frequently listed single activity (55 students, 20.75%). Fish farming with mask making and pet care with mask making were the most frequently reported combinations (20 students each, 7.55%). Interest in growing, creating, or managing activities was the most frequently recorded motivation (116 students, 43.77%), followed by obtaining a small source of income (110 students, 41.51%). However, the two activity tables account for only 246 of the stated 265 students, and the social purpose of the activities was not documented. The findings describe recorded activity categories and motivations; they do not establish the prevalence of social entrepreneurship or its association with communication skills. The activities provide a starting point for school projects that explicitly address community needs, beneficiary participation, and social value. Reconciliation of the activity counts and completion of methodological and ethics reporting are necessary before submission.

References

[1] Bacigalupo, M., Kampylis, P., Punie, Y., & Van den Brande, G. (2016). EntreComp: The entrepreneurship competence framework. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2791/593884

[2] Dees, J. G. (2001). The meaning of social entrepreneurship (Revised May 30, 2001; original draft October 31, 1998). Center for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship, Duke University. https://centers.fuqua.duke.edu/case/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2015/03/Article_Dees_MeaningofSocialEntrepreneurship_2001.pdf

[3] Huber, L. R., Sloof, R., & Van Praag, M. (2014). The effect of early entrepreneurship education: Evidence from a field experiment. European Economic Review, 72, 76–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.09.002

[4] Mair, J., & Martí, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002

[5] Moberg, K. (2014). Two approaches to entrepreneurship education: The different effects of education for and through entrepreneurship at the lower secondary level. The International Journal of Management Education, 12(3), 512–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2014.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2014.05.002

Downloads

Published

2026-09-15

How to Cite

Bindu, T. V. (2026). Participation and Motivation in Activities Relevant to Social Entrepreneurship among Secondary School Students in Kerala. International Journal of Management and Development Studies, 15(9), 76-82. https://doi.org/10.31305/ijmds.v15n09.007

Similar Articles

1-10 of 73

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.